Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
2.
Injury ; 51(12): 2822-2826, 2020 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-764864

ABSTRACT

COVID-19 has had profound management implications for orthopaedic management due to balancing patient outcomes with clinical safety and limited resources. The BOAST guidelines on outpatient orthopaedic fracture management took a pragmatic approach. At Great Western Hospital, Swindon, a closed loop audit was performed looking at a selection of these guidelines, to assess if our initial changes were sufficient and what could be improved. METHOD: An audit was designed around fracture immobilisation, type of initial fracture clinic assessment, default virtual follow up clinic and late imaging. Interventions were implemented and re-audited. RESULTS: Initially 223 patients were identified over 4 weeks. Of these, 100% had removable casts and 99% did not have late imaging. 96% of patients were initially assessed virtually or had initial orthopaedic approval to be seen in face to face clinic. 97% had virtual follow up or had documented reasons why not. The 26 patients who were initially seen face to face were put through a simulated virtual fracture clinic. 22 appointments and 13 Xray attendances could have been avoided. We implemented a change of requiring all patients to be assessed at consultant level before having a face to face appointment. The re-audit showed over 99% achievement in all areas. CONCLUSION: Virtual fracture clinics, both triaging new patients and follow-up clinics have dramatically changed our outpatient management, helping the most appropriate patients to be seen face to face. Despite their limitations, they have been well tolerated by patients and improved patient safety and treatment.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/prevention & control , Fractures, Bone/therapy , Orthopedics/organization & administration , Outpatient Clinics, Hospital/organization & administration , Telemedicine/organization & administration , Aftercare/organization & administration , Aftercare/standards , Aftercare/statistics & numerical data , COVID-19/epidemiology , Communicable Disease Control/standards , England , Fracture Fixation , Fractures, Bone/diagnosis , Guideline Adherence/statistics & numerical data , Health Plan Implementation , Humans , Medical Audit/statistics & numerical data , Office Visits/statistics & numerical data , Orthopedics/standards , Orthopedics/statistics & numerical data , Outpatient Clinics, Hospital/standards , Outpatient Clinics, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Pandemics/prevention & control , Patient Safety , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Program Evaluation , Societies, Medical/standards , Telemedicine/standards , Telemedicine/statistics & numerical data , Treatment Outcome
3.
Clin Radiol ; 75(9): 705-708, 2020 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-612669

ABSTRACT

AIM: To report on a snap audit of all departments in the UK as to the value of preoperative thoracic imaging, preferably computed tomography (CT), of patients undergoing any surgery to assess for changes consistent with COVID-19 preoperatively. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All Imaging departments in the UK were contacted and asked to record the number of preoperative CT examinations performed in patients being considered for both emergency and elective surgical intervention over a 5-day period in May 2020. RESULTS: Forty-seven percent of departments replied with data provided on >820 patients. Nineteen percent of additional preoperative CT was in patients undergoing elective intervention and 81% in patients presenting with surgical abdominal pain. There was a high rate of false positives in patients who tested negative for COVID-19, producing a sensitivity for thoracic CT of 68.4%. CONCLUSION: This UK-wide audit demonstrates that a large number of additional thoracic imaging examinations over a 5-day period were performed with a low sensitivity for the identification of COVID-19 in this preoperative group of patients. Given these findings, it is difficult to justify this additional examination in this group of patients.


Subject(s)
Betacoronavirus , Coronavirus Infections/diagnostic imaging , Medical Audit/methods , Pneumonia, Viral/diagnostic imaging , Preoperative Care/methods , Surgical Procedures, Operative , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods , COVID-19 , Humans , Lung/diagnostic imaging , Medical Audit/statistics & numerical data , Pandemics , Prospective Studies , Radiography, Thoracic , Reproducibility of Results , SARS-CoV-2 , Sensitivity and Specificity , United Kingdom
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL